Also called: hydraulic analysis, bed material sampling, flood modelling
Concept diagram (TheBridgeEng)
How it is done Gather discharge records and derive the design flood (typically 100-year for design, 500-year for check). Survey the channel and sample the bed material; look for armouring and for the depth of erodible sediment above rock. Model the flood profile and velocities; compute local pier scour, contraction scour and long-term degradation (HEC-18 or the local method). Set pile embedment below the total scour depth with a margin, or design scour protection.
Where it fits Every river, estuary and tidal crossing; also canals with fast flows. Where it does not Using a single average velocity for a braided or meandering river; the thalweg can move to any pier.
Plant, pace and money Plant Survey boat with echo sounder, ADCP for velocities, bed samplers.
Productivity A few days of fieldwork and a few weeks of modelling.
Cost A small fraction of the project; the game's scour check is HEC-18 and it is the most common reason a design is marked poor.
Risks and controls What goes wrong Bed changes during construction (cofferdams narrow the channel). Debris rafts on piers increasing effective pier width. Quality assurance Post-construction bed survey and a monitoring plan with a trigger level.
Examples Schoharie Creek 1987 (US) and many monsoon-region collapses are scour failures.
Related methods
Further reading FHWA HEC-18 and HEC-20 · AASHTO LRFD Section 2.6