Construction methods · Site investigation and testing

Pile integrity testing (sonic echo and cross-hole sonic logging)

Tests that look for defects rather than capacity: necking, voids, soil inclusions and poor concrete in bored piles. Sonic echo taps the head; cross-hole sonic logging sends pulses between tubes cast into the pile; thermal profiling reads the heat of hydration.

How bridges get built · Site investigation and testing · Pile integrity testing (sonic echo and cross-hole sonic logging)

Also called: low-strain test, PIT, CSL, thermal integrity profiling

Pile integrity testing (sonic echo and cross-hole sonic logging) — concept diagram — Concept diagram (TheBridgeEng)

How it is done

Cross-hole: cast three to six steel or PVC tubes in the cage; after curing, lower a transmitter and receiver down pairs of tubes and log first-arrival time with depth.
Sonic echo: strike the trimmed pile head and read reflections for a length-to-diameter ratio up to about 30.
Thermal: fibre optics or thermal wires read the concrete temperature 12-48 hours after pouring; cold zones are defects or reduced cover.

Where it fits

All bored piles on bridges; CSL is standard on shafts above 1 m.
Driven concrete piles suspected of driving damage (sonic echo).

Where it does not

Sonic echo on long slender piles or piles with many joints; the signal is lost.

Plant, pace and money

PlantCSL logger and probes, PIT hammer and accelerometer, thermal wires and readout.

ProductivityFour to ten piles per day.

CostUSD 500-2,000 per pile for CSL; a few hundred for sonic echo.

Risks and controls

What goes wrong

Tubes debonding from the concrete give false anomalies.
Anomalies near the toe are hard to distinguish from base debris.

Quality assurance

Anomaly rating criteria agreed before testing; coring or grouting protocol for confirmed defects.

Examples

Every large-diameter shaft on modern sea bridge pylons carries CSL tubes.